[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: delete-process bug
From: |
Agustin Martin |
Subject: |
Re: delete-process bug |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:41:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 04:20:43PM +0200, Michaël Cadilhac wrote:
> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>
> > address@hidden (Michaël Cadilhac) writes:
> >
> >> The whole patch follows:
> >
> > Thanks. Installed.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Now that this bug is fixed, Agustin, can you check (a third time) if
> the first patch is OK? (Copy of the message follows)
Tested with 20060524 snapshot with your ispell.el patch and today's last
installed process.c (with the last patch)
> 1) (original test) Quick switching between two flyspellized buffers
> that have different dictionaries,
Works very well
> 2)
>
> (let (processes)
> (dotimes (i 100)
> (push (start-process "bug" nil "/tmp/sleep") processes))
> (dotimes (i 50)
> (if (zerop (mod i 2))
> (delete-process (pop processes))
> (kill-process (pop processes))))
> (message "%S" (call-process "/tmp/sleep"))
> (dotimes (i 50)
> (delete-process (pop processes)))
> (message "%S" (call-process "/tmp/sleep")))
I am getting
if: Process bug<98> is not active
here,
--
Agustin