[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: text_property_stickiness
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: text_property_stickiness |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:59:03 -0400 |
I've changed updated the relevant docstrings to reflect this. I
didn't make any changes to the code of text_properties_stickiness to
silence the source code checker, though, just added a comment.
Thanks. You could add a conditional and a call to abort
as a way to silence the code checker.
- text_property_stickiness, Chong Yidong, 2006/06/24
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/25
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Chong Yidong, 2006/06/25
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Miles Bader, 2006/06/26
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Chong Yidong, 2006/06/26
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Miles Bader, 2006/06/26
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/27
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Chong Yidong, 2006/06/27
- Re: text_property_stickiness,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/27
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/26