emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: safe_call1 considered harmful


From: Kenichi Handa
Subject: Re: safe_call1 considered harmful
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:14:00 +0900
User-agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     We can change tar-mode/arc-mode/jka-compr to call
>     find-operation-coding-system with full number of arguments
>     plus the extra argument BUFFER.

> I'd rather leave it alone.

If you think the backward incompatible problem raised by the
current code is not that a big problem, I don't argue
anymore.  Shall I install this change in etc/NEWS?

*** NEWS        31 Jul 2006 09:41:07 +0900      1.1382
--- NEWS        31 Jul 2006 14:08:58 +0900      
***************
*** 3661,3668 ****
  
  * Incompatible Lisp Changes in Emacs 22.1
  
! ** The function find-operation-coding-system accepts a cons (FILENAME
! . BUFFER) in an argument correponding to the target.
  
  ---
  ** The variables post-command-idle-hook and post-command-idle-delay have
--- 3661,3670 ----
  
  * Incompatible Lisp Changes in Emacs 22.1
  
! ** The function find-operation-coding-system may be called with a cons
! (FILENAME . BUFFER) in the second argument if the first argument
! OPERATION is `insert-file-contents', and thus a function registered in
! `file-coding-system-alist' is also called with such an argument.
  
  ---
  ** The variables post-command-idle-hook and post-command-idle-delay have

---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]