Re: C-g crash redux

[Nick Roberts]

 > The previous code suggestion I gave was not well thought out.  The
 > correct way to implement this is as follows.  I've checked that with
 > this change, the addition of wait_reading_process_output_unwind does
 > not cause a crash when C-g is done during sit-for.
 > 
 > Do you think this is the right approach?
 >... 

It looks good to my inexperienced eye, but Emacs seems to go for a long time
before hitting Fsignal.  I wonder if Fsignal resets other things that might not
add up in the interim period but I don't know what the rules are for placing
the QUIT macro or whether one could be placed closer to read_char.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob