[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Out-of-date completions for `read-buffer'

From: Stuart D. Herring
Subject: Re: Out-of-date completions for `read-buffer'
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-7.el3.7lanl

> I think it is worth fixing.  Copying the alist pairs as well as the
> alist itself would be simple and avoid any danger of crashing.  It
> would still "complete wrong" in the case of creating or killing
> buffers, but that seems like a minor issue.  So I think that solution
> would be fine.  However, the `complete-buffer' solution you proposed
> would be fine too.
> Would you like to fix it one way or the other?

It turned out that the `complete-buffer' method was easy, since
Vbuffer_alist is of course still around: see the attached (hopefully
trivial) patch.  The name of the new function and its doc string might
both need improvement.


This product is sold by volume, not by mass.  If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during

Attachment: read-buffer.patch
Description: Binary data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]