[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: why "in_sighandler"?

From: Jan Djärv
Subject: Re: why "in_sighandler"?
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:00:13 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird (Macintosh/20060719)

YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu skrev:

Recursive mutex is implemented using a simpler lock mechanism.  That's
why I used the term "lock" instead of "mutex".

All mutexes in glibc on GNU/Linux are implemented with a lower level lock. As I said before, both fixes have some drawbacks. If you want to install your fix, go right ahead, it will work equally well.

        Jan D.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]