[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Did something change with respect to Emacs idle loop:
From: |
Andreas Seltenreich |
Subject: |
Re: Did something change with respect to Emacs idle loop: |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:53:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
[fontification loop vs. subprocesses]
"T. V. Raman" <address@hidden> writes:
> This does sound like it could be the culprit ---
> I'd be happy to test if it were possible to do a cvs update, and
> then undo just this patch and build.
An easy way to confirm it might be toggling global-font-lock-mode. If
my guess was right, the symptoms should correlate with that setting.
The last version of jit-lock.el that has the problem is 1.56. So,
cvs up -r 1.56 lisp/jit-lock.el
should show the symptoms, while
cvs up -A lisp/jit-lock.el
doesn't. Note that the file is dumped into Emacs, so besides
byte-compiling it, you'd have to either dump a new emacs or explicitly
load the file for the changes to take effect.
regards,
andreas
- Re: Did something change with respect to Emacs idle loop:, (continued)
- Re: Did something change with respect to Emacs idle loop:, T. V. Raman, 2006/09/24
- Re: Did something change with respect to Emacs idle loop:, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/25
- Re: Did something change with respect to Emacs idle loop:, T. V. Raman, 2006/09/27
- Re: Did something change with respect to Emacs idle loop:, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/27
- Re: Did something change with respect to Emacs idle loop:, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/23
Re: Did something change with respect to Emacs idle loop:, Andreas Seltenreich, 2006/09/26