[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: allout bugfixes - small bugs in charts, exposure specs

From: Ken Manheimer
Subject: Re: allout bugfixes - small bugs in charts, exposure specs
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:29:20 -0400

my apologies, steve - i was too cursory when i looked back through my
allout correspondance.  i really do appreciate the fix, even if i
didn't  keep your name straight!

i've attached a new ChangeLog fragment, with separate entries for
stephen's and my changes (and a formatting error corrected, besides),
and the same, consolidated patch as before.


On 9/30/06, Stephen Berman <address@hidden> wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:04:24 -0400 Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:

>           (allout-expose-topic): Rectify implementation of "+" spec, so that
>           the subtrees are hidden and only the headlines are exposed.
>           (Thanks to bill white for contributing this fix.)
> Please don't ever put other people's code under your name in the
> change log file.  That would confuse our copyright clerk.
> If that change was written by Bill White, you should put it
> in a change log entry with his name on it, not under your name.

Since you seem to want an accurate record, I feel compelled to say
that, unless Bill White happened to send Ken the same patch as I did,
I think the change he referred to is one I sent him.  Since it's only
a three line patch, I have no objection to it appearing under Ken's
name.  If you think it's important that it appear under my name, of
course I have no objection to that either (and if copyright assignment
is necessary, I did sign papers for Emacs some years ago).

Steve Berman

Attachment: allout-patch.txt
Description: Text document

Attachment: ChangeLog-entry.txt
Description: Text document

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]