[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Keybinding nit

From: Nick Roberts
Subject: Re: Keybinding nit
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:19:02 +1300

 > > If you mean move C-x 4 0 to C-x 5 k, I agree.  (I'm not sure what you want
 > > C-x 4 k to do).
 > Serves me right.  If it weren't for disagreement, I'd have no
 > agreement at all.  I'd have proposed to move C-x 4 0
 > (`kill-buffer-and-window') to C-x 4 k and have C-x 5 k be mapped to
 > `kill-buffer-and-frame' (which does not yet exist).

Sorry, I misunderstood what C-x 4 0 does (I don't use it).  Yes, C-x 5 k
for kill-buffer-and-frame seems a good idea.

Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]