[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and GFortran
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and GFortran |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:23:06 +0900 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> In the case you're talking about, it is certainly better to generate 3
> different error messages, one for each of those error loci, using the
> GNU standard format to indicate them.
And in fact, that's what the _existing_ gfortran code seems to do: it
emits 3 separate "loci" lines (using their non-standard format for the
file/line-number), finally followed by the text of the error message.
As far as I can tell, Alfred's one line (!) patch would make things work
perfectly using the standard format.
-Miles
--
Saa, shall we dance? (from a dance-class advertisement)
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, (continued)
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Miles Bader, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/30
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Miles Bader, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, FX Coudert, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, François-Xavier Coudert, 2006/10/30