[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CVS commits and logs

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: CVS commits and logs
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 04:38:18 +0900

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I dislike multi-file CVS commits specifically because of the clutter
> of having the entire change log entry in the log of each file.
>     And what about multiple _authors_?  Most of my commits are from
>     automatic merging, which more often than not involves multiple authors.
> Is this all a matter of Gnus?  We could handle Gnus specially.

Primarily Gnus, yes.

I basically wanted to point out that the guidelines being discussed,
while they definitely make prettier commit logs (I prefer that general
style too), are problematic for some uses.  [The fact that they make
simultaneous commit impossible is also a problem generally of course.]

Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it
has to be us.  -- Jerry Garcia

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]