|Subject:||Re: find-library-name fails if file (with no extension) exists.|
|Date:||Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:33:01 +0100|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 22.214.171.124 (Windows/20061025)|
Romain Francoise wrote:
"Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> writes:The current behavior, then, has the problem that compiling files with no extension, or non-default ones:mylib => mylib.elc mylib.dat => mylib.dat.elcbut help from describe-function and friends points to nonexistent "mylib.el" and "mylib.dat.el".Yes, because of `describe-simplify-lib-file-name'... The reliable approach would be to look into the compiled file, it contains the source file's name. But it would be overkill.
Maybe look into the compiled file if the first-guess source file does not exist?
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|