[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc.

From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
Subject: Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc.
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 12:40:03 +0900
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shij┼Ź) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.91 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

>>>>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:08:09 +0100, address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) said:

>> Currently we only have usr1 and usr2 signals, but if we add more
>> (the "etc") later, this would be a cleaner interface for such
>> extensions.

> For example, we could handle SIGTERM, SIGHUP, and SIGQUIT like this
> to allow a user to handle those signals in some other way:

I'm concerned about the case that kbd_buffer_store_event_hold is
called from the signal-handler context while it is also executed in
the normal context.  This has already existed for SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2
before your change, though.

                                     YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]