[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc.

From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
Subject: Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc.
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:14:06 +0900
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.91 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

>>>>> On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:38:21 -0500, Chong Yidong <address@hidden> said:

> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>> So I would rather redefine them to single events (named sigusr1 and
>> sigusr2 as those names are already known to the signal-process
>> function), and handle them through special-event-map as you
>> suggested.

> In that case, is there a rationale for the rather large changes
> checked into emacs.c, keyboard.c, and process.c over the last two
> weeks?  Should they not be reverted?

Do the "large changes" you think should be reverted include my
2006-12-14 changes?  These changes are not for the event format but
for fixing a problem that has existed for a long time.  That is, about
calling a non-reentrant function in a signal handler context while it
is executed in a normal context.

                                     YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]