[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: transpose-sexps
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: transpose-sexps |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:13:31 +0900 |
Paul Pogonyshev <address@hidden> writes:
> As long as other other "sexp" is empty it doesn't make sense to
> "transpose" with it. Humans are not computers, they will get only
> confused by it. Or what do you mean by " " sexp?
A string is an sexp. " " is a string containing a single space.
Emacs sees on the left side of point, a sexp: " ", and on the right side
of point, another sexp: f. It swaps them. That's what the command
does.
[Maybe, as Richard mentioned, it should be more friendly by detecting
that it's inside a string and do... something... in that case (what??),
but detecting that is not particularly trivial (and so is not a suitable
change just before a release).]
-Miles
--
Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here,
beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?
- transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Andreas Schwab, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/05
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stefan Monnier, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Andreas Schwab, 2007/01/05
- Re: transpose-sexps, Richard Stallman, 2007/01/04