[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:08:28 +0100 |
On 2/5/07, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
Could you think of something in code or docs that should have
prevented the confusion?
I misread the code (I was much more centered in the part about undoing
defun, provide, etc. and didn't take a closer look to the beginning of
the function), but I think this piece of docstring is a bit confusing
This function tries to undo modifications made by the package to
hooks. Packages may define a hook FEATURE-unload-hook that is called
instead of the normal heuristics for doing this. Such a hook should
undo all the relevant global state changes that may have been made by
loading the package or executing functions in it.
because if you miss the "to hooks" (two words), as I did in several
readings, it seems like it is saying that either you define
FEATURE-unload-hook, or else it uses "the normal heuristics".
/L/e/k/t/u
- unload-feature questions and thoughts, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/04
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, David Kastrup, 2007/02/04
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/04
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, David Kastrup, 2007/02/04
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/04
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, David Kastrup, 2007/02/05
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, David Kastrup, 2007/02/05
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, David Kastrup, 2007/02/05
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/05
Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/05