[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Image mode
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Image mode |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:14:43 +0100 |
On 2/5/07, Chong Yidong <address@hidden> wrote:
Indeed, xpm and xbm are special in that they can be treated as both C
files and images.
As it is Postscript. That's part of the reason
`image-type-auto-detected-p' and `image-type-auto-detectable' were
introduced.
Let us
remove xpm/xbm detection from image-type-auto-detected-p
That's just setting them to nil in `image-type-auto-detectable'.
Still...
If people agree with this design, I can implement it quite easily.
...I really, knees-on-the-ground, wholeheartedly BEG we don't do more
accretion-patching without taking half a dozen steps back to gain some
perspective.
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: Image mode, (continued)
- Re: Image mode, David Kastrup, 2007/02/06
- Re: Image mode, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, David Kastrup, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Mathias Dahl, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Mathias Dahl, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Jason Rumney, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/02/05
- Re: Image mode, Chong Yidong, 2007/02/05