[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:02:48 +0300

> From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:47:06 +0900
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
>       address@hidden
> As the other people say, I strongly recommend to add
> something like the following text in etc/PROBLEMS.
> On Windows, to bind a non-ASCII character with some modifier
> to a command, you must specify a raw byte code.  For
> instance, if you want to bind meta-a-grave to a command:
>   (global-set-key [?\M-\340] ...)
> That is for the case of Latin-1 environment where the byte
> code of a-grave is \340.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]