[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?

From: Lennart Borgman (gmail)
Subject: Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:33:03 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/ Mnenhy/

Andreas Schwab wrote:
"Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <address@hidden> writes:

Thanks, but why should it not be permanent buffer local then?

Why should it?

The reason I am asking is that I thought that there might be a chance that a kill-all-local-variables caused caused by the undo command might erase it. I am not at all sure that this is the case, but I am currently testing and at least with that change (permanent buffer local) I can not currently see the problems I saw before.

Can you see any way it can be erased by kill-all-local-variables before it should?

And my original question: Can you see any problems with making this variable permanent buffer local? (And are there perhaps other variables involved in undo that should also be permanent buffer local?)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]