[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:03:00 +0300 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:02:08 -0400
>
> > It seems easier, but in fact to DTRT according to the documentation
> > above means dropping support for Windows 95, 98 and ME, and modifying
> > ALL system messages to use Unicode, which is major work. I think it is
> > worth doing that for Emacs 22, because Windows 98 and ME are almost
> dead
> > now, and probably will be by the time Emacs 22 s released, and also
> with
> > the change of Emacs' internal representation, Unicode fits better.
>
> I added an entry to etc/TODO based on this.
>
> As I've already said, I think this change would probably be a bad
> thing. People can try it and see whether it works well enough
> on the old Windows versions. But if it doesn't, I think it should
> not be installed.
If you've read what I added to TODO, you know that I never meant to
encourage a change that will not work on Windows 9x.
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Eli Zaretskii <=