[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual? |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:56:18 -0400 |
Done. I mentioned this in NEWS. I am not sure about the DOC string
of `query-replace-regexp-eval', though: since it is obsoleted, would
it be appropriate to have all the info except that of its deprecation
be ripped from it?
Our general policy is to retain the information about a function
and what it does, when we make it obsolete. I see no reason to make
a special exception for this function. So please do not delete anything.
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, (continued)
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, David Kastrup, 2007/04/15
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/04/15
- RE: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, Drew Adams, 2007/04/15
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, Robert J. Chassell, 2007/04/15
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/15
- RE: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, Drew Adams, 2007/04/15
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/16
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, David Kastrup, 2007/04/16
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/17
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, David Kastrup, 2007/04/17
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?, David Kastrup, 2007/04/18