[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pretest 22.0.100

From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: Re: pretest 22.0.100
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 10:20:39 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux)

>> Yes, the same mistake was made then (but was not made for Emacs-20.1).
>> It's no excuse to repeat it.

> If it was deliberate, then it was not a mistake. And history shows that
> Emacs has always had version numbers, not version strings.

If people feel so strongly about it, go for it and use 22.0.100 or any other
number that makes you happy, really.  I just think 22.0.990 etc... is much
cleverer since it makes it both numerically and alphabetically increasing.
I never imagined people would waste time arguing against it.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]