[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Another pretest after 22.0.99 (was: pretest 22.0.100)
From: |
Reiner Steib |
Subject: |
Another pretest after 22.0.99 (was: pretest 22.0.100) |
Date: |
Thu, 17 May 2007 18:43:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, May 17 2007, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> If people feel so strongly about it, go for it and use 22.0.100 or any other
> number that makes you happy, really. I just think 22.0.990 etc... is much
> cleverer since it makes it both numerically and alphabetically increasing.
> I never imagined people would waste time arguing against it.
Although I put .100 in the subject, I don't care at all if it is .100
or .990 or whatever. I was only suggestion to do another one after
22.0.99 as there have been many C and lisp changes compared to
22.0.99, so releasing another pretest now seems appropriate, IMHO.
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, (continued)
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Jason Rumney, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Jason Rumney, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, David Kastrup, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Ralf Angeli, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Ulrich Mueller, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Jay Belanger, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/17
- Re: pretest 22.0.100, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/17
- Another pretest after 22.0.99 (was: pretest 22.0.100),
Reiner Steib <=
Re: We can use python.el, Michaƫl Cadilhac, 2007/05/12