[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:22:04 -0400 |
Actually, the value of TERM is only for internal use and should never be
passed on to subprocesses, so its presence in process-environment is
not important.
That is true, in a sense. However, at present the primitives to create
subprocesses just pass TERM along to the subprocess. Thus, it is up to
the Lisp code to set it.
Should this work differently? Should we do something in call-process
and start-process to set TERM?
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, (continued)
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
- Re: Post-22.1 development?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/15
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/15
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/15
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/15