[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:48:17 +0200 |
On 6/15/07, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
AFAIK, the number of elements on this hook doesn't have any impact
on fragility.
IMO, the more functions in a hook, the bigger the possibility of
unexpected interactions. Call me paranoid.
I haven't looked in detail, but unless the Elisp code needs to go through
funny contortions to do its job
No, no funny contortions. It's non configurable, though; it should be fixed.
The C version is not a mode, it's always on (though it does nothing
unless minibuffer-depth-indicator is a string of non-zero length).
That's a big plus in my view. I hate having modes for trivialities: a
new function and a new mode variable just for this. Grr.
Juanma
- Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/06
- Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth, Kim F. Storm, 2007/06/15
- RE: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth, Drew Adams, 2007/06/15
- Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/15
- RE: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth, Drew Adams, 2007/06/15
- Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/15
- RE: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth, Drew Adams, 2007/06/15
- Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/15
- RE: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth, Drew Adams, 2007/06/16
- Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/06/16
- Re: feature request: indicator of minibuffer-recursion depth, Juri Linkov, 2007/06/16