[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: new image library "requirements"

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: new image library "requirements"
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:38:52 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
>> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:26:00 -0400
>> An error message is the right thing when a crucial feature
>> that ought to work would fail due to missing headers.
> How is the case of image libraries different from the X headers and
> libraries?  Currently, if X headers and/or libraries were not found
> by the configure script, we just print this in the summary at the end
> of configure, and continue as if --without-x was specified.  Are you
> saying that X support is less crucial than image support?

It goes without saying that the same holds for X, and in fact there
have been proposals for what check to use here.

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]