[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: walk-windows
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: walk-windows |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jul 2007 10:46:12 -0700 |
> Can someone please explain a little about the logic behind the
> treatment of a standalone minibuffer frame in `walk-windows'
> (hence also `count-windows')?
...
> The first two sentences in the third paragraph seem to conflict....
> Which is correct? This is important, because it determines the
> meaning of `all-frames' when it is nil, because the doc string
> says, about that, "the frames as specified above".
>
> Beyond this confusion, I don't understand why you would want to
> include windows on another frame, if all-frames is nil.
Can anyone help here? See original post for more info.
- walk-windows, Drew Adams, 2007/07/10
- RE: walk-windows,
Drew Adams <=