Re: Scratch buffer annoyance

[Juri Linkov]

>     It is very useful to create a *scratch* buffer at startup, even if it is
>     not displayed immediately.
>
> Why do you find it particularly useful?

Emacs without a *scratch* buffer is not Emacs :-)

>     Perhaps, a better name is `initial-display'?
>
> That seems a little less clear than `initial-buffer-contents'.
> However, perhaps `initial-buffer-setup' is better.

With a new naming scheme David proposed this name could be
`setup-initial-buffer'.

-- 
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/