Re: Is this patch of gnus/pop3.el reasonable?

[Stainless Steel Rat]

On Oct 1, 2007, at 2:32 AM, Zhang Wei wrote:
> The current version of pop3.el is quite different from that of xemacs,
> it still didn't support UIDL command, which is quite urgent to prevent
> gnus from fetching the same message repeatedly while messages are kept
> on the server.

UIDL does not exist in RFC 1460, the spec that was current when I  
wrote pop3.el.

I wrote pop3.el because I had a need for it.  If you have need of  
something new then you should write it.  That is part of the nature  
of free software.
--
\m/  (--)  \m/