[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:23:50 +0200 |
On 10/11/07, Eric S. Raymond <address@hidden> wrote:
> Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>:
> How about this: VC can test whether some VCS considers itself responsible
> for a directory. I could change the logic to error out when no VCS considers
> itself responsible for the current directory. Would that cover your
> use case?
I think so, yes.
Juanma
- vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/14
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Andreas Schwab, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/11