[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: isearch multiple buffers
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: isearch multiple buffers |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:32:21 +0200 |
On 10/26/07, Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> wrote:
> So yes, the fact that the DOS code is present has an impact on
> everyone that does work on emacs. As long as there are users for that
> code this is fine, but there's no evidence that there are such users.
I have no opinion on this discussion, but with respect to the point
above, it is not inconceivable to think that ports for old
architectures could be still in use in less developed countries, where
upgrading to the new-and-shiny-processor-do-jour is often
impractical... That reason has been given many times to maintain the
support for Windows 95/98/Me, and does not seem too far-fetched to
extend that to MS-DOS.
Juanma
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, (continued)
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Robert J. Chassell, 2007/10/25
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/25
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Robert J. Chassell, 2007/10/25
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Robert J. Chassell, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Michael Olson, 2007/10/28
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, David Kastrup, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Jason Rumney, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, David Kastrup, 2007/10/26