[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: isearch multiple buffers
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: isearch multiple buffers |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:22:08 -0700 |
> Using a dedicated mark requires creating a new keybinding and a new mark
> to be able to mark with a dedicated mark. Wouldn't it be simple just have
> a dedicated key to start isearch on normal marks?
OK by me.
Another choice point: If there are marks in both Dired and Buffer List,
should the same key search all of them? Likewise, for marks in multiple
Dired buffers.
I think so, but there might be a reason to treat Dired marks and Buffer List
marks separately (?).
And if marks in multiple buffers are treated together (same key), and we
provide for a way to order the marks in a given buffer, what is the overall
order among the marks in the various Dired buffers and Buffer List?
- RE: isearch multiple buffers, (continued)
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/28
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Juri Linkov, 2007/10/28
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/29
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/27
- RE: isearch multiple buffers, Drew Adams, 2007/10/27
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Juri Linkov, 2007/10/27
- RE: isearch multiple buffers,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/10/28
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Juri Linkov, 2007/10/28
- RE: isearch multiple buffers, Drew Adams, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Miles Bader, 2007/10/26
- RE: isearch multiple buffers, Drew Adams, 2007/10/26
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Miles Bader, 2007/10/26
- RE: isearch multiple buffers, Drew Adams, 2007/10/27
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Juri Linkov, 2007/10/27
- RE: isearch multiple buffers, Drew Adams, 2007/10/27
- Re: isearch multiple buffers, Juri Linkov, 2007/10/27