[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7
From: |
Daiki Ueno |
Subject: |
Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7 |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:37:33 +0900 |
2007/11/5, Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>:
> >> Again, you're tightly bound to GnuPG. Does EasyPG support arbitrary,
> >> user-supplied ciphers? I didn't see that ability.
>
> DU> I doubt that the ability is worth considering. Who wants to use
> DU> user-supplied ciphers which are appearantly weaker than ones GnuPG
> DU> supports?
>
> The proper question is, why don't you let the users use the ciphers and
> external utilities they want? You are assuming that every Emacs user
> will a) install GnuPG, and b) find it adequate. Furthermore, you're
> basing your "apparently weaker" argument on an example XOR
> implementation I supplied to show the API, which is unfair.
In that case, the first thing you should do is to provide real "use
cases" of user-defined ciphers, I think.
Regards,
--
Daiki Ueno
- Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7, (continued)
- Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7, Sascha Wilde, 2007/11/09
- Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7, Reiner Steib, 2007/11/06
- Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7, Ted Zlatanov, 2007/11/07
- Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/07
- Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7, Ted Zlatanov, 2007/11/07
- Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7, Reiner Steib, 2007/11/07
- Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7, Ted Zlatanov, 2007/11/07
Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7, Ted Zlatanov, 2007/11/02