Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 10:16:50 +0900 "Daiki Ueno" <address@hidden> wrote: 

DU> 2007/11/8, Daiki Ueno <address@hidden>:
>> 2007/11/7, Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>:

>> > So far Stefan Monnier, Reiner Steib, and I have said this is something
>> > we want.  Daiki Ueno is the only one to have spoken against it.
>> > Excluding the package maintainers for each side, this is 2-0.  Any more
>> > votes for either side?
>> 
>> They really use encrypt.el and are saying that they want to use such
>> sort of extension?  It seems not.

Stefan wrote:
> I think there's enough space in the Emacs world for both to coexist.

Reiner wrote:
> I think it would be useful to have at least one builtin encryption
> (without requiring external programs) in Emacs, if possible.

I'd rather get actual votes at this point than debate semantics.  So, if
anyone wants to vote for or against encrypt.el, please do (including
Stefan and Reiner, please, to remove ambiguity).  I think I have said
enough on the topic to make up everyone's mind.  I will integrate with
rijndael.el if anyone needs that.

DU> Also, I'm not against that we have at least one builtin cipher.  I
DU> just opposed that including a crap called encrypt.el.

So your vote is a no, as we've already established.  Let's move on.

Ted