[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions can now be silenced
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions can now be silenced |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:02:22 -0500 |
> Also, IMO it would be good to add declare-function to the 22.2
> branch, (even as an empty stub if it's considered too risky), this
> should help with compatibility between the 2 branches.
I don't have much of an opinion. It could easily be added as a no-op
(it's almost a no-op now...).
I think that is the best approach.
- Re: suppressing byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions, (continued)
- Re: suppressing byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/13
- Re: suppressing byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/13
- Re: suppressing byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions, Glenn Morris, 2007/11/14
- Re: suppressing byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/14
- Message not available
- byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions can now be silenced, Glenn Morris, 2007/11/18
- Re: byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions can now be silenced, martin rudalics, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions can now be silenced, Glenn Morris, 2007/11/23
- Re: byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions can now be silenced,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions can now be silenced, Glenn Morris, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions can now be silenced, Jay Belanger, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions can now be silenced, Glenn Morris, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions can now be silenced, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/20
Re: suppressing byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions, Alan Mackenzie, 2007/11/11