[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: byte compiling defcustom
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: byte compiling defcustom |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:48:25 -0600 (CST) |
>From my previous message:
It seems clear that in terms of actual optimization,any gains would be
neglegible and the main reason to compile would be to emit warnings.
To me, no change seems necessary, but if the lack of warnings worries
people, can the compiler not just warn about, say, obsolete variables
and such without _changing_ anything about the code,
With the usual ways to disable such warnings, of course, since the
potential for fake warnings would be even a lot bigger that usual.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, (continued)
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/11/18
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/18
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/11/18
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Luc Teirlinck, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/20
- Re: byte compiling defcustom,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/19
- Re: byte compiling defcustom, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/17