Re: remember(-diary).el

[Michael Olson]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     I would strongly prefer for the code to remain in a separate file,
>     for the sake of modularity.
>
> Modularity of design is no reason to keep it a separate file.
> A piece of code can still be modular even if it is in the same file
> with other code.
>
> Is there any more specific issue of modularity at stake here?

The `remember-diary-extract-entries' function needs `make-diary-entry',
and so remember-diary.el must do (require 'diary-lib).  It would be a
shame to make remember.el require 'diary-lib even for people who have no
intention of using Diary.

-- 
       Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652     |
 http://mwolson.org/ -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net  |  /` |\ | | |
            Sysadmin -- Hobbies: Lisp, GP2X, HCoop    | |_] | \| |_|
Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner |

pgpsEo4u4T2FJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature