[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: duplicate input methods: german-postfix and german-alt-postfix

From: Andreas Schwab
Subject: Re: duplicate input methods: german-postfix and german-alt-postfix
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:12:07 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux)

Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:

> In article <address@hidden>, Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
>> Hi,
>> the input methods german-postfix and german-alt-postfix are completely
>> identical, AFAICS.
>> I think it's confusing.  I'd suggest to either remove
>> german-alt-postfix (keep it as comment it in leim/quail/latin-alt.el?)
>> or add "identical to german-postfix" in the documentation of
>> german-alt-postfix.
>> BTW, my impression is that `latin-alt.el' was derived from
>> `latin-post.el' and modifications to most languages (input methods)
>> were changed, but german wasn't.  Is this historically correct?  Just
>> curious...
> I've found many other input methods (e.g. danish-postfix vs
> danish-alt-postfix) are the same.

None of these input methods use the problematic characters as postfix.


Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]