[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: status icon support
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: status icon support |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:26:24 -0500 |
As you can see from the message cited above the discussion was not about
changing what we have now, but about what to do with new code.
K&R definitions are ok in new code. They have always been ok.
Until a couple of years ago I insisted on K&R style function
definitions. Then I decided to accept ANSI style also, but that is as
far as we have gone.
I don't want to reconsider the question at this time,
because there are many other more important things to do
than reconsider this.
- Re: RFC: status icon support, (continued)
- Re: RFC: status icon support, David Kastrup, 2008/01/12
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Andreas Schwab, 2008/01/12
- Re: RFC: status icon support, David Kastrup, 2008/01/12
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Andreas Schwab, 2008/01/12
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/13
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/13
- Re: RFC: status icon support,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: RFC: status icon support, David Kastrup, 2008/01/14
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/14
Re: RFC: status icon support, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/01/13
Re: RFC: status icon support, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/14