[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like

From: Mark A. Hershberger
Subject: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:43:01 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     - Bzr seems to take second place. It has a long term progression path
>       and support, very strict code quality and clearly defined
>       development phases.
> BZR may become a GNU package, which would be a reason to prefer it.

Another reason to prefer it: stand-alone bzr binaries are available and
work *now* in Windows.  I've used bzr to do some work on a Windows port
of the iHRIS system I'm working on.

GPG Fingerprint: 7E15 362D A32C DFAB E4D2  B37A 735E F10A 2DFC BFF5

Ideas create idols; only wonder leads to knowing.
    -- St. Gregory of Nyssa

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]