[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: State of VC?

From: Dan Nicolaescu
Subject: Re: State of VC?
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:44:35 -0800

Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:

  > () Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
  > () Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:40:31 -0800
  >    it made more sense to spend time writing proof of concept code,
  >    and there was little point to spend time writing ISO9000 type
  >    documents describing it.  On top of that, everything was
  >    discussed at length on the list.
  > All i ask for is some comments in the source code, as a courtesy
  > to anyone who has not followed the discussion.  I think a brief
  > summary (no need for a lot of spew) of the conclusions reached,
  > together w/ the code, would "prove" the concept better.

I added a description.
(Being less obnoxious about this would have been appreciated)

  >      > Personally, i don't think vc-directory for Git is that bad
  >      > (w/ some tweaking)[0].  
  >    You mean "vc-git-hacking"? That link does not work.
  > I see this:
  >  $ cd /tmp
  >  $ git clone http://www.gnuvola.org/wip/vc-git-hacking.git
  >  Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/vc-git-hacking/.git/
  >  got 9e2f244ec65b24f8c78d3488ca506a3b5f2892e6
  >  walk 9e2f244ec65b24f8c78d3488ca506a3b5f2892e6
  >  got 340ef0ef0a358e20ef6a468a1ac57d538aa043bf
  >  got b8b0d6fe86d729b7faee7eee112d1844c8a1332b
  >  [...53 lines deleted...]
  > What do you see?

It works now, it used to give an error saying something about needing to
run update-server-info.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]