[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:40:10 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:46:03 +0200
> From: "Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > > Hm. I would've said that the whole point of cvs-update is to be more
> > > correct than recompile; else, why not simply use recompile, which is
> > > faster?
> >
> > Because without the other prerequisites of cvs-update, especially
> > autoloads, you will have a buggy Emacs.
>
> I thought that was implied in "to be more correct than recompile" ;-)
It is more correct, but it does not aim to be absolutely correct. It
is okay for it to fail in rare situations, if that saves a significant
amount of time.
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/04/10
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v, Jason Rumney, 2008/04/10
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/10
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v, Jason Rumney, 2008/04/10
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/04/10
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/11
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/04/11
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/11
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/04/11
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v,
Eli Zaretskii <=