[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le |
|
Date: |
Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:54:46 +0300 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:10:07 +0200
>
> How does recode-region work with encodings having a BOM? Probably the
> problem is not dissimilar to working with shift encodings. Still I have
> a hard time to picture either.
I'm not following: what exactly puzzles you in this, and why
recode-region is an issue?
utf-16le vs utf-16-le, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/04/13
- Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/13
- Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/04/14
- Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le, David Kastrup, 2008/04/14
- Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/04/14
- Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/04/14
- Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/04/14