[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le

From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Subject: Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:35:39 +0900

Stefan Monnier writes:

 > > What I proposed was a more generic concept where use of signatures and
 > > the EOL convention would (at least to the user) appear as buffer-local
 > > variables.

Note the *at least to the user*.

 > [For EOLs], I disagree: EOL processing definitely need to take
 > place when talking to subprocesses,

Yes, it has to *take place* when talking to subprocesses, but I don't
see why it should be controlled by proliferation of (user-visible)
coding systems.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]