[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:37:07 -0700 |
"Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Maybe they are lower case in your setup (Windows?), they very much are
> > in mine.
>
> My point was/is that is defined that way.
That might have been your intention, but that is not what you actually
said, and what I was replying to.
> Whether it is not working for some font backend / font combination
> is another issue altogether (a bug, to be precise).
> > lucidasanstypewriter used to be (maybe still is) the
> > one of the more popular fixed width fonts.
>
> There are lots of fixed width fonts. DejaVu Sans Mono, for example, is
> increasingly popular (and it works OK with this feature).
This is unrelated to what I wrote and the context I wrote it in. DejaVu
Sans Mono is also not useful to X11 emacs for emacs 22, AFAICT it is not
available as a core X font.
> > The face is not a problem, but it is just odd to downcase the text.
> > I do consider this a bug, but if everyone likes that as a default, then
> > so be it.
>
> It is already clear that it is a feature you don't like, but I find it
> a bit insulting that you keep referring to it as a "bug".
This type of attitude is one of the reasons emacs-devel is such an
unpleasant environment lately.
The discussion was about a feature that recently changed behavior, and
the statement you replied to was clearly labeled as _a personal opinion_
and clearly stated that it didn't require a change if that is what most
people want. Stating that criticism of a feature is an insult is a
clear way to drive people way from any type of discussion.
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, (continued)
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/04/14
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Glenn Morris, 2008/04/14
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/04/14
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/15
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/04/15
- RE: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Drew Adams, 2008/04/15
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/04/15
- RE: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Drew Adams, 2008/04/15
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/15
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/04/15
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/04/15
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/15
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/15
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Jason Rumney, 2008/04/15
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Kenichi Handa, 2008/04/15
- Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/15