[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge
|
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
|
Subject: |
Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 May 2008 20:51:26 -0700 |
Evil Boris <address@hidden> writes:
> I see Emacs executable size grew by more than a factor of 2 after
> Unicode merge. (This is on Solaris 7 "sparc-sun-solaris2.7, X
> toolkit", with ancient gcc 3.1.)
>
> Does everyone see that, too?
Yes, it's noted in admin/FOR-RELEASE
- size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Evil Boris, 2008/05/13
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/14
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/05/14
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/15
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/05/15
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/16
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/05/16
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Kenichi Handa, 2008/05/16
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Jason Rumney, 2008/05/16
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Thomas Lord, 2008/05/16
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/16