[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accumulated fontset definition tweaks for testing
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Accumulated fontset definition tweaks for testing |
Date: |
Fri, 16 May 2008 16:50:32 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, address@hidden writes:
> Below is the complete set of fontset changes that my system needed to
> display the HELLO file and Markus Kuhn's "UTF-8-demo.txt" file. There
> are various problems with the fontset definitions that we can fix in
> Emacs Lisp.
> 1. The "symbol" and "phonetic" scripts don't have any representative
> characters defined, and they don't have any fontset defined.
> 2. The Latin script doesn't have representative characters over
> 7-bits. This means the Xft backend doesn't have any constraint that
> would reject ISO8859-1 fonts. Emacs appears to have special support
> for real ISO8859-1 characters, so the new definition should not
> break anything.
> 3. The Armenian script has representative characters, but no fontset
> defined.
> 4. The Thai fontset definition assumes that you have OpenType set
> up. It needs a fallback in case you don't.
> 5. The Hangul fontset definition assumes that you have a language
> definition in your Hangul font. It needs a fallback in case you
> don't.
Thank you for them. I'm going reflect 1 to 3 in fontset.el.
I think 4 and 5 is not necessary if we implement
registry-representative-chars as I wrote in the previous
mail.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden