[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8 |
Date: |
Mon, 19 May 2008 12:11:17 +0900 |
Patrick Drechsler writes:
> I second the opinion that it would be nice to have the option to hide
> (or remove) the BOM while editing the file in Emacs and reinserting it
> (if it was removed) when done editing.
I believe that there is a utf-8-signature or similarly named coding
system which does this. (It's called utf-8-bom in XEmacs but IIRC
Emacs uses the more accurate name, since UTF-8 is of course always
bigendian.)
You can use the auto-coding-alist (or something like that) to ensure
that files with certain names always get the strip-BOM-on-input,
prepend-BOM-on-output behavior.
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, (continued)
23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/17
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Miles Bader, 2008/05/17
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/17
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/18
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Jason Rumney, 2008/05/18
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Patrick Drechsler, 2008/05/18
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Patrick Drechsler, 2008/05/19
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/19
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Patrick Drechsler, 2008/05/20
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, joakim, 2008/05/18
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/18
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Miles Bader, 2008/05/18
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, David Kastrup, 2008/05/18
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/18
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, David Kastrup, 2008/05/19
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/19