Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el]

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Richard M Stallman <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 10:13:25 -0400
> 
>                             Then someone else could reimplement them in
>     a portable fashion.
> 
> I tend to think it is better to leave this unportable code in Lisp
> than to move it to C, because I think the amount of unportable
> code in C would be much much more.

Now I have a challenge in hand to prove that you are wrong.