Re: C-M-TAB stand-in for M-TAB, on MS Windows?

[David De La Harpe Golden]

Drew Adams wrote:
>> Usually C-M-i is effectively M-TAB though?
>> (Since traditionally ^i => TAB)
> 
> That suggestion was in the archives. IMO, it's not very helpful in this 
> context
> that TAB is C-i - that provides little more than a pun or mnemonic here.

But N.B. at least on X (can't test windoze), C-M-i /currently/ works the
same as "real" M-TAB in isearch etc. (unlike ESC TAB).  What does it do
on windoze?